复制和删除移动类型时报错sv033

When we try to create in the customizing transaction OMJJ a new movement type as a copy of a standard movement type we might receive the error message “Specify the key within the work area” (Message no. SV033).

This will be the case if the previous definition of the Work Area that we have just made is incorrect:

 

When we run the customizing transaction OMJJ a pop-up window appears to restrict the Field Selection. Here we just set a flag on ‘Movement type’ and continue.

 

image

 

 

Then a new pop-up window is displayed: ‘Determine Work Area: Entry’.

Here is where we need to determine a correct Work Area that comprises not only the original movement type (the one that we desire to copy) but also the target movement type (the one that we wish to create).

At this point we can select then, for instance, as a Work Area, from the standard movement type 201 to the new movement type that we will be creating: 921.

 

image

 

 

We continue by pressing enter.

 

Then select the movement type that we want to copy, 201, and click the icon ‘Copy as…’ (F6).

Overwrite the selected movement type with the new movement type to be created:

 

image

image

image

 

Then, copy all dependent entries:

 

image

 

The system will copy all control indicators from the reference movement type to the new movement type.

 

After the copy has been finished you will get a message with the number of dependent entries copied. When accepted, you will be sent back to the Overview window where you will be able to see the message “Number of entries copied: 1” (Message no. SV014).

 

The new movement type 921 will be created already, and you will be able to change its settings as desired, according to your own needs, but, please, do not forget to save when you have finished! Otherwise the data will be lost.

本文作者: GavinDong

版权属于: GavinDong博客

文章链接: https://gavindong.com/1618.html

如果使用过程中遇到问题,可 **点击此处** 交流沟通。

版权所有,转载时必须以链接形式注明作者和原始出处及本声明。

(0)

相关文章

发表回复

登录后才能评论

评论列表(1条)

  • 董 家军的头像
    ag 2017.09.15 18:16

    this is an annoying issue which comes up every now and then, usually i bypass it by the trial and error method