在激活经营范围的时候,系统自动产生、扩展相关的表,Account-based CO-PA和Costing-based CO-PA对应的底层表各不相同。
Costing-based CO-PA
Costing-based CO-PA analyzes fixed and variable data at the value field level by characteristic. ECC推荐这种方式。
Uses the following set of tables, which are unique:
– Table CE1xxxx: Actual line items
– Table CE2xxxx: Plan line items
– Table CE3xxxx: Summary records (profitability segment)
– Table CE4xxxx: Profitability segment definitions
备注:“xxxx” indicating the 4-character key for the operating concern:
Account- and costing-based CO-PA share a single table: table CE4xxxx. This table controls the creation of the profitability segment, which is technically the cost object for CO-PA. 参考文章《BSEG和COPA表的对应关系》。
Costing-based CO-PA的两个缺点:
1)已发货未开票时,对于开票才确认成本的模式,由于GOGS入账时点的差异,月末的时候COPA和FI对不上。
2)由于是value field级别存储数据的,COPA和FI对账麻烦。
Account-based CO-PA
Account-based CO-PA can analyze data at the G/L account level by characteristic. 新实施的S4项目,推荐使用这种方式。
Account-based CO-PA uses the following tables, which exist also for other cost objects:
– Table COEP: Actual line items for value types other than value types 4 and 11
– Table COEJ: Plan line items
– Table ACDOCA: Universal Journal
ECC里的Account-based CO-PA比较鸡肋,不推荐使用,但S4版本中增强了Account-based CO-PA,官方推荐使用这种方式。主要的增强项:
1)COGS split可以在科目级别过账;
2)生产差异过账也可以在科目级别过账;
2)数据统一在ACDOCA里,没有对账的烦恼了;
备注:In SAP S/4HANA, CO-PA characteristics are not captured in the FI line item table BSEG; rather, characteristics are captured in table ACDOCA. As the operating concern is generated, table ACDOCA is extended.
相关文章
本文作者: GavinDong
版权属于: GavinDong博客
文章链接: https://gavindong.com/11012.html
如果使用过程中遇到问题,可 **点击此处** 交流沟通。
版权所有,转载时必须以链接形式注明作者和原始出处及本声明。